Costless Information and Costly Verification: A Case for Transparency

56 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2019 Last revised: 18 Jan 2021

See all articles by Deniz Kattwinkel

Deniz Kattwinkel

University College London - Department of Economics

Jan Knoepfle

Queen Mary University of London - School of Economics and Finance

Date Written: July 25, 2019

Abstract

A principal has to take a binary decision. She relies on information privately held by a completely biased agent. The principal cannot incentivize with transfers but can learn the agent's information at a cost. Additionally, the principal privately observes a signal correlated with the agent's type. Transparent mechanisms are optimal: unlike in standard results with correlation, the principal's payoff is the same as if her signal was public. They take a simple cut-off form: favorable signals ensure the agent's preferred action. Signals below this cut-off lead to the nonpreferred action unless the agent appeals. An appeal always triggers type verification.

Keywords: Mechanism Design without Transfers, Costly Verification, Robust Mechanism Design, Transparency

JEL Classification: D61, D82, K40

Suggested Citation

Kattwinkel, Deniz and Knoepfle, Jan, Costless Information and Costly Verification: A Case for Transparency (July 25, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3426817 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3426817

Deniz Kattwinkel (Contact Author)

University College London - Department of Economics ( email )

Drayton House, 30 Gordon Street
30 Gordon Street
London, WC1H 0AX
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/view/kattwinkel

Jan Knoepfle

Queen Mary University of London - School of Economics and Finance ( email )

Mile End Road
London, London E1 4NS
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,010
Abstract Views
3,632
Rank
55,906
PlumX Metrics