Investment Arbitration Reform and the Pacific Rim Consensus

21 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2019 Last revised: 27 Nov 2023

See all articles by Mark Feldman

Mark Feldman

Peking University School of Transnational Law

Date Written: August 29, 2019

Abstract

Three distinct models of investment treaty practice have emerged, along geographic lines: a European model, a regional South model and a Pacific Rim model. Unlike the European and regional South models, the Pacific Rim model - although incorporating many policy innovations over the past few decades - has not diverged from past investment treaty practice in any fundamental respect. The combination of the Pacific Rim model’s adherence to past investment treaty practice, together with the European Union’s flexible, ‘open architecture’ approach to investment law reform, create opportunities for the Pacific Rim model to play a key role in advancing ongoing UNCITRAL Working Group III discussions on investment law reform; those discussions should further strengthen the resilience of the Pacific Rim model. The enduring Pacific Rim consensus on investment treaty practice can contribute significantly to the success of UNCITRAL Working Group III reform efforts.

Keywords: RCEP, CPTPP, UNCITRAL, China, Pacific Rim, investment arbitration, investment treaties, BITs, mega-regional FTAs

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Mark, Investment Arbitration Reform and the Pacific Rim Consensus (August 29, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3444733 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3444733

Mark Feldman (Contact Author)

Peking University School of Transnational Law ( email )

China

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
1,496
Rank
592,433
PlumX Metrics