Communicating Explanatory Synthesis

Perspectives [vol. 14 no. 3, Spring 2006]

3 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2020

See all articles by Michael D. Murray

Michael D. Murray

University of Kentucky - J. David Rosenberg College of Law

Date Written: March 15, 2006

Abstract

The T-R-E-A-T paradigm and the doctrine of explanatory synthesis are both organizational methodologies and substantive theories designed to improve the substance of legal writing. The TREAT paradigm doctrine holds that the presentation of legal discourse in a carefully constructed order not only promotes clarity and satisfies audience expectations but also maximizes the communicative potential and persuasiveness of the substance of the material.

Explanatory synthesis (the “E” of TREAT) improves the substance of legal writing by combining precedents and revealing the factors and policies that determine the outcome of these precedents. Explanatory synthesis follows the path of inductive reasoning through exploration of the species of situations where a given legal rule has been applied to produce a concrete outcome (i.e., the cases), and derives the genera of principles of interpretation and application of the rule that can be presented in legal writing.

Keywords: Explanatory synthesis, TREAT format, T-R-E-A-T, explanation sections, synthesis, legal writing, advocacy

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K3, K30, K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Murray, Michael D., Communicating Explanatory Synthesis (March 15, 2006). Perspectives [vol. 14 no. 3, Spring 2006], Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3520158

Michael D. Murray (Contact Author)

University of Kentucky - J. David Rosenberg College of Law ( email )

620 S. Limestone Street
Lexington, KY 40506-0048
United States
219-299-9777 (Phone)
859-323-1061 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://law.uky.edu/people/michael-murray

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
844
Rank
753,595
PlumX Metrics