Immigrant and Native Consumption of Means‐​Tested Welfare and Entitlement Benefits in 2016: Evidence from the Survey of Income and Program Participation

8 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2020

See all articles by Tu Le

Tu Le

Texas A&M University

Alex Nowrasteh

Cato Institute - Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity

Date Written: January 14, 2020

Abstract

The federal government spent more than $2.3 trillion in 2016 on the welfare state, an amount equal to approximately 60 percent of all federal outlays in that year. About $1.6 trillion of those expenditures went to Social Security and Medicare, and the other roughly $700 billion was used to fund means-tested welfare benefits. Based on data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, we find that immigrants consume 21 percent less welfare and entitlement benefits than native-born Americans on a per capita basis. The per capita cost of providing welfare to immigrants is substantially less than the per capita cost of providing welfare to native-born Americans.

Keywords: Welfare, Immigration, Native-Born, Americans, Federal Spending, Social Security, Medicare, Survey of Income and Program Participation, SNAP, SSI, TANF, WIC

JEL Classification: H5, H50, H51, H53, H55, I30, I31, I32, I39

Suggested Citation

Le, Tu and Nowrasteh, Alex, Immigrant and Native Consumption of Means‐​Tested Welfare and Entitlement Benefits in 2016: Evidence from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (January 14, 2020). Immigration Research and Policy Brief, Cato Institute, January 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3520918

Tu Le

Texas A&M University

Langford Building A
798 Ross St.
College Station, TX 77843-3137
United States

Alex Nowrasteh (Contact Author)

Cato Institute - Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity ( email )

1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
1,212
Rank
580,653
PlumX Metrics