The Emergency Paradox: Constitutional Interpretation in Times of Crisis

Edinburgh Law Review (Forthcoming)

9 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2020

Date Written: November 01, 2020

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an extreme challenge to legal and political structures around the globe. Institutions are struggling to cope with this new reality, none more strenuously than our legal systems which have rapidly introduced and frequently amended criminal and other sanctions in the hopes of curbing the spread of the virus. In such circumstances, the old adage that desperate times call for desperate measures rings true, prompting calls for a loosening or suspension of previously held legal norms. This paper explores the role that the concept of an emergency plays in our interpretation of fundamental constitutional principles such as the rule of law.

Keywords: Constitutional Interpretation, Rule of Law, Emergency

Suggested Citation

Foran, Michael P., The Emergency Paradox: Constitutional Interpretation in Times of Crisis (November 01, 2020). Edinburgh Law Review (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3733010 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733010

Michael P. Foran (Contact Author)

University of Glasgow ( email )

School of Law
Glasgow, Scotland G12 8LE
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
514
Rank
420,260
PlumX Metrics