The Lawsuit against the United States for Causing COVID-19

Journal of East Asia and International Law, Vol. 13/No.2 (2020); 233-246

14 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2021 Last revised: 6 Dec 2021

See all articles by Patthara Limsira

Patthara Limsira

Faculty of Law, Ramkhamhaeng University

Date Written: October 14, 2020

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents varieties of questions concerning not only international law, but also the domestic laws of states affected by this global pandemic. One of legal issues amid COVID-19 pandemic is the state immunity principle. There have been many lawsuits against foreign state challenging the state immunity principle amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In Thailand, the Chiangmai Provincial Court (court) addressed in its judgment that it did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the compensation for COVID-19 pandemic’s damages dispute between Thai restaurant owner and the United States (US). Notwithstanding surrounding controversies over COVID-19 pandemic, the court considered the motion denied. The main implication of the judgment is that Thailand accepted state immunity principle under customary international law. This research briefly explains the sovereign immunity doctrine relating to this case, summarizes the facts and analyses the potential ramifications of this judgement under international law.

Keywords: Sovereign Immunity Doctrine, State Immunity Principle, Thailand, United States, COVID-19, Lawsuit, Application of Customary International Law

Suggested Citation

Limsira, Patthara, The Lawsuit against the United States for Causing COVID-19 (October 14, 2020). Journal of East Asia and International Law, Vol. 13/No.2 (2020); 233-246, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3802305

Patthara Limsira (Contact Author)

Faculty of Law, Ramkhamhaeng University

Ramkhamhaeng Rd.,
Huamark, Bangkapi,
Bangkok, 10240
Thailand

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
692
PlumX Metrics