Encryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: What Happens When a Suspect Refuses to Divulge a Password

41 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2021

See all articles by Daniel Hochstrasser

Daniel Hochstrasser

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University) - Graduate School of Business and Law

Date Written: June 15, 2021

Abstract

The use of encryption has embedded itself in everyday life. This has consequences for law enforcement, which is increasingly encountering it in the performance of its duties. This article examines what happens when law enforcement demands the password to an encrypted device and the suspect refuses to provide that password on the basis that to do so will be a breach of the privilege against self-incrimination. While only a small number of Australian cases have considered this question, there is an extensive body of case law in the United States. Canada and England and Wales have also considered this issue. This article examines how those jurisdictions have dealt with this issue and identifies the lessons that Australian courts can take from their experience.

Keywords: encryption, privilege against self-incrimination, evidence, password

Suggested Citation

Hochstrasser, Daniel, Encryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: What Happens When a Suspect Refuses to Divulge a Password (June 15, 2021). University of New South Wales Law Journal, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3921454

Daniel Hochstrasser (Contact Author)

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University) - Graduate School of Business and Law ( email )

Melbourne
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
191
Abstract Views
1,280
Rank
405,402
PlumX Metrics