The Political-Economy of U.S. Automobile Protection
96 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2003 Last revised: 2 Mar 2024
Date Written: May 1994
Abstract
This paper examines the political process through which the U.S. auto industry pursued and ultimately received protection from Japanese competition. Following a brief review of research on the competitiveness of the industry (section II) and on the effects of protection on industry performance (section III), it is not at all obvious that trade protection was the most effective policy response to the industry's economic problems. The remainder of the paper argues that the industry's political strategy reflects a response to a crisis in the political-economic regime regulating relations among the major interests in the U.S. auto industry. To make this argument, section IV develops the notion of a sectoral regime and applies it to the auto industry. Section V develops the argument further suggesting that conditions in the industry constituted a regime crisis and reexamines the industry's pursuit of aggressive trade policy toward Japanese producers in this context. Section VI illustrates the usefulness of this perspective by examining the politics of North American integration from the perspective of the auto industry. Section VII concludes.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
What Does the Political Economy Literature on Trade Policy (Not) Tell Usthat We Ought to Know?
By Dani Rodrik
-
Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?
By Anna Maria Mayda and Dani Rodrik
-
Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?
By Anna Maria Mayda and Dani Rodrik
-
Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills
-
Industry or Class Cleavages Over Trade Policy? Evidence from the Britishgeneral Election of 1923
-
Political Ideology and Endogenous Trade Policy: An Empirical Investigation
By Pushan Dutt and Devashish Mitra