Creating a Bot-tleneck for Malicious AI: Psychological Methods for Bot Detection

38 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2023

See all articles by Christopher Rodriguez

Christopher Rodriguez

Carnegie Mellon University

Daniel Oppenheimer

Carnegie Mellon University

Date Written: February 24, 2023

Abstract

The standard approach for detecting and preventing bots from doing harm online involves CAPTCHAs. However, recent AI research suggests that bots can complete many common CAPTCHAs with ease. The most effective methodology for identifying potential bots: involves completing image-processing, causal-reasoning based, free-response questions that are hand coded by human analysts. However, this approach is labor intensive, slow, and inefficient. Here, we develop and test various automated, bot-screening questions, grounded in psychological research, to serve as a proactive screen against bots. Utilizing hand coded free-response questions in the naturalistic domain of MTurkers recruited for a Qualtrics survey, we identify 18.9% of our sample to be bots, whereas Google’s reCAPTCHA V3 identified only 1.7% to be bots. We then look at the performance of these identified bots on our novel bot-screeners, each of which has different strengths and weaknesses but all of which outperform CAPTCHAs.

Keywords: Bot-detection, Survey Design, Cybersecurity, Data Validation, Human-computer interaction

Suggested Citation

Rodriguez, Christopher and Oppenheimer, Daniel, Creating a Bot-tleneck for Malicious AI: Psychological Methods for Bot Detection (February 24, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4411054 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4411054

Christopher Rodriguez (Contact Author)

Carnegie Mellon University ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA
United States

Daniel Oppenheimer

Carnegie Mellon University ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
Abstract Views
893
Rank
514,995
PlumX Metrics