Not as Good as it Used to Be: Do Streaming Platforms Penalize Quality?
34 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2024 Last revised: 25 Sep 2025
There are 3 versions of this paper
Not as Good as it Used to Be: Do Streaming Platforms Penalize Quality?
Not as Good as it Used to Be: Do Streaming Platforms Penalize Quality?
Not as Good as it Used to Be: Do Streaming Platforms Penalize Quality?
Date Written: June 19, 2024
Abstract
In this study, we analyze the incentives of a streaming platform to bias consumption when products are vertically differentiated. The platform offers mixed bundles of content to monetize consumer interest in variety and pays royalties to sellers based on the effective consumption of the generated content. When products are not vertically differentiated, the platform has no incentive to bias consumption in equilibrium. With vertical differentiation, royalties can differ, and the platform biases recommendations in favor of the cheapest content, hurting consumers and high-quality sellers. Crucially, biased recommendations distort investment incentives to the point that, if unconstrained, sellers’ incentives to increase the quality of their content are neutralized.
Keywords: platform economics, media economics, content aggregator, recommendation bias, innovation
JEL Classification: D4, L1, L5
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation