Unfair Learning: GenAI Exceptionalism and Copyright Law

Forthcoming, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (2026)

46 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2024 Last revised: 16 Oct 2025

See all articles by David Atkinson

David Atkinson

The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA

Date Written: August 02, 2025

Abstract

This paper challenges the argument that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is entitled to broad immunity from copyright law for reproducing copyrighted works without authorization due to a fair use defense. It examines fair use legal arguments and eight distinct substantive arguments, contending that every legal and substantive argument favoring fair use for GenAI applies equally, if not more so, to humans. Therefore, granting GenAI exceptional privileges in this domain is legally and logically inconsistent with withholding broad fair use exemptions from individual humans. It would mean no human would need to pay for virtually any copyright work again. The solution is to take a circumspect view of any fair use claim for mass copyright reproduction by any entity and focus on the first principles of whether permitting such exceptionalism for GenAI promotes science and the arts.

Keywords: AI, GenAI, Generative AI, Copyright, Fair Use

Suggested Citation

Atkinson, David, Unfair Learning: GenAI Exceptionalism and Copyright Law (August 02, 2025). Forthcoming, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (2026), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4975857 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4975857

David Atkinson (Contact Author)

The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
457
Abstract Views
2,144
Rank
160,353
PlumX Metrics