Ekici's Reclaim-proof Allocations Revisited

18 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2024 Last revised: 11 Oct 2024

See all articles by Qianfeng Tang

Qianfeng Tang

Shanghai University of Finance and Economics - School of Economics

Zhan Zhu

Shanghai University of Finance and Economics - School of Economics

Date Written: October 11, 2024

Abstract

We revisit the concept of reclaim-proof allocations proposed by Ekici (2013) for house allocation problems with existing tenants. As a concept of core, the definition of reclaim-proof allocations assumes that when a coalition blocks an allocation, an agent in the coalition is allowed to bring her allocated object into the coalition, even when it is privately owned by an outsider. We propose a new notion of core called the effectual core by restoring the feasibility of coalitional blocking in Ekici's definition. Our main result shows that the effectual core, while by definition weaker than reclaim-proofness, is actually equivalent to it. Together with Ekici's results, it is then immediate that an allocation is in the effectual core if and only if it is produced by the You request my house-I get your turn (YRMH-IGYT) mechanism (Abdulkadiroğlu and Sönmez, 1999) and if and only if it is a competitive allocation.

Keywords: Core, house allocation with existing tenants, indivisible objects, top trading cycles

JEL Classification: C78, D61

Suggested Citation

Tang, Qianfeng and Zhu, Zhan, Ekici's Reclaim-proof Allocations Revisited (October 11, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4983814 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4983814

Qianfeng Tang

Shanghai University of Finance and Economics - School of Economics ( email )

777 Guoding Road
Shanghai, 200433
China

Zhan Zhu (Contact Author)

Shanghai University of Finance and Economics - School of Economics ( email )

777 Guoding Road
Shanghai, 200433
China

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
547
Rank
679,608
PlumX Metrics