Assessing Hedge Fund Performance with an Information-based Multiple Test

73 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2025 Last revised: 10 Jun 2026

See all articles by Po-Hsuan Hsu

Po-Hsuan Hsu

National Tsing Hua University - Department of Quantitative Finance

Tren Ma

University of Nottingham

Ioannis Psaradellis

University of Edinburgh Business School

Georgios Sermpinis

University of Glasgow

Date Written: August 31, 2025

Abstract

We develop fwer+, an information-based multiple-testing procedure for selecting outperforming funds while controlling the family-wise error rate. The method conditions rejection thresholds on fund-level and macroeconomic covariates, improving power relative to unconditional procedures in hedge-fund simulations. Applied to U.S. hedge funds from 1997 to 2023, fwer+ selects portfolios that outperform passive benchmarks and generate significant out-of-sample alphas across targets and factor models. The information driving selection is concentrated in macroeconomic and risk-exposure variables, suggesting that skill is tied to navigating changing economic conditions.

Keywords: Data Snooping, Multiple Testing, Multivariate Family-Wise Error Rate, Informative Covariates, Hedge Fund

Suggested Citation

Hsu, Po-Hsuan and Ma, Tren and Psaradellis, Ioannis and Sermpinis, Georgios, Assessing Hedge Fund Performance with an Information-based Multiple Test (August 31, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5423519 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5423519

Po-Hsuan Hsu

National Tsing Hua University - Department of Quantitative Finance ( email )

101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road
Hsinchu, Taiwan 300
China

Tren Ma (Contact Author)

University of Nottingham ( email )

University Park
Nottingham, NG7 2RD
United Kingdom

Ioannis Psaradellis

University of Edinburgh Business School ( email )

Georgios Sermpinis

University of Glasgow ( email )

Adam Smith Business School
Glasgow, Scotland G12 8LE
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Abstract Views
580
Rank
679,608
PlumX Metrics