Adhering Indigenous Communities to the State: Recognition Politics During Civil Conflict

62 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2026

See all articles by Michael Albertus

Michael Albertus

University of Chicago - Department of Political Science

Date Written: March 20, 2026

Abstract

Numerous countries in recent decades have formally recognized collective indigenous claims to territory and self-governance during civil conflict despite challenges to state authority and social order. How does collective indigenous recognition impact conflict violence within communities? This paper shows that indigenous recognition can shore up order and state reach. It does so in Peru, where the state recognized thousands of indigenous communities during an internal conflict from 1980-2000 that disproportionately impacted indigenous Peruvians. Using a staggered difference-indifference research design and an original spatial mapping of conflict violence to indigenous communities, I find that formal recognition reduced wartime violence. Further analysis of community characteristics as well as state and community counterinsurgency efforts indicates that as recognition fosters greater legibility and transfers disputes into state institutions, it invites state penetration and coordination with state actors that ultimately adheres communities to the state.

Keywords: Conflict, Civil War, Violence, Insurgency, Latin America, Indigenous Politics, Political Science, Political Economy, Conflict Studies

Suggested Citation

Albertus, Michael, Adhering Indigenous Communities to the State: Recognition Politics During Civil Conflict (March 20, 2026). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6445981 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6445981

Michael Albertus (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Department of Political Science ( email )

1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
106
PlumX Metrics