Platform Preferencing and Price Competition I: Evidence from Amazon 

41 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2025 Last revised: 7 Aug 2025

See all articles by Olivia Hartzell

Olivia Hartzell

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Andreas Haupt

Stanford University - Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence

Date Written: January 24, 2025

Abstract

A platform's preferencing mechanism, or rule that assigns the placement of offers on a platform, determines both firm and consumer welfare. First, we theoretically derive a platform's consumer-optimal preferencing rule in a setting in which firms choose prices in a locally envy-free profile, given the preferencing rule. In special cases, locally envy-free outcomes correspond with equilibria in a Generalized Second Price auction. Additionally, we show that Reimers and Waldfogel (2023) empirical test to measure platform bias is valid even under prices that are endogenous to the preferencing rule in a locally envy-free profile. On Amazon, we measure the extent of platform bias using a large dataset from the platform during the years 2020-2022.

Keywords: Game Theory, Industrial Organization, Auction Design

Suggested Citation

Hartzell, Olivia and Haupt, Andreas, Platform Preferencing and Price Competition I: Evidence from Amazon  (January 24, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5126918 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5126918

Olivia Hartzell (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Andreas Haupt

Stanford University - Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence ( email )

210 Panama St.
Cordura Hall
Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
321
Abstract Views
1,485
Rank
239,208
PlumX Metrics