The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty

Neumeier, Stefanie and Wayne Sandholtz. 2019. “The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty.” UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 4:124-60.

38 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2020 Last revised: 17 Mar 2020

See all articles by Stefanie Neumeier

Stefanie Neumeier

University of Southern California - Department of Political Science and International Relations

Wayne Sandholtz

University of Southern California - School of International Relations; University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Date Written: 2019

Abstract

A transnational legal order (TLO) authoritatively shapes “the understanding and practice of law” in a specific area of social activity, involving both state and civil society actors, and linking national, regional, and international levels. We argue that a TLO has emerged and settled since 1945 around capital punishment. Our analysis of the death penalty TLO treats “bottom-up” and “top-down” effects as interconnected, addresses the creation of legal order at both national and international levels, and emphasizes the recursivity linking developments at both levels. We trace the development of death penalty abolition from its origins in the immediate aftermath of World War II. Because the practical effects of abolition — in shaping legal and penal practice — necessarily occur at the national level, the analysis focuses on the international, transnational, and domestic factors that lead states to end capital punishment. After describing the emergence of a TLO abolishing the death penalty, we offer a new way of measuring the global and country-specific activities of transnational advocacy groups (Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International). We incorporate that measure in an analysis of data from about 150 countries. The central hypothesis is that making the TLO on capital punishment effective through abolition in national law requires modes of political action that overcome majoritarian public support for retention. We suggest two domestic institutional features that make abolition more likely despite retentionist popular opinion: proportional representation in the legislature and independent courts. We also suggest that transnational non-governmental organizations (NGO) and some regional organizations can support the move to abolish. The data analysis is largely consistent with these propositions and brief case studies illustrate the principal mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

Neumeier, Stefanie and Sandholtz, Wayne, The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty (2019). Neumeier, Stefanie and Wayne Sandholtz. 2019. “The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty.” UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 4:124-60., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3532076

Stefanie Neumeier

University of Southern California - Department of Political Science and International Relations ( email )

327 VonKleinSmid Center
University Park
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0044
United States

Wayne Sandholtz (Contact Author)

University of Southern California - School of International Relations ( email )

Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

University of Southern California Gould School of Law ( email )

Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
589
PlumX Metrics