Polarization and the US Electoral College

23 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2020

See all articles by James Siderius

James Siderius

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

Date Written: March 30, 2020

Abstract

In light of the 2000 and 2016 presidential elections, there has been doubt about whether the electoral college is a "fair'' way of selecting a presidential candidate. Rather than taking a position on the issue, this paper attempts to quantify the importance of such a discussion. Toward this end, we consider a voting model based on regional and personal biases, which provides a unifying framework for other probabilistic models in the literature along with offering new ones. Our main contribution is the derivation of simple expressions for the asymptotic likelihood of a "referendum paradox,'' whereby one candidate wins the election according to the electoral college, but loses the popular vote. We then consider how this likelihood varies depending on the heterogeneity of opinions within and across regions of a country, which may also differ in population. We conclude that rising polarization of political beliefs leading up to the 2020 election has made these two election formats increasingly more incompatible.

Keywords: Voting Systems, Elections, Computational Social Science, Agent-Based Modeling, Applied Probability

JEL Classification: D72, C25

Suggested Citation

Siderius, James, Polarization and the US Electoral College (March 30, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3564820 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3564820

James Siderius (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Electrical Engineering and Computer Science ( email )

77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
545
Abstract Views
1,689
Rank
126,423
PlumX Metrics