Whole Woman's Health: Not the 'Whole' Story

27 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2020

Date Written: February 28, 2019

Abstract

This Note examines how the undue burden standard imposed by the Supreme Court in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt negatively and disproportionately subjects women to lower healthcare and safety standards when, in an attempt to promote women's rights, abortion proponents continue to challenge time-tested state statutes. This Note focuses on two statutes in particular, licensed-physician statutes and telemedicine abortion statutes, and explores how state legislatures might better position themselves to combat abortion proponents' recent challenges to these statutes by preserving their interest in protecting women's health and safety and the lives of the unborn.

Keywords: abortion, telehealth, telemedicine

JEL Classification: K36

Suggested Citation

Silveria, Tifani, Whole Woman's Health: Not the 'Whole' Story (February 28, 2019). Regent University Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3565277

Tifani Silveria (Contact Author)

Regent University School of Law ( email )

Virginia Beach, VA 23464
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
414
Rank
980,173
PlumX Metrics