The Current Corporate Sentencing Proposals: History and Critique

Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1990

6 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2020

See all articles by Jeffrey S. Parker

Jeffrey S. Parker

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

Date Written: 1990

Abstract

On October 26, 1990, the United States Sentencing Commission released another proposed draft of corporate sentencing guidelines. A competing proposal by the Department of Justice was also released. Both are largely embellishments of 1989 Commission proposals' that produced an uproar in the business community and Congressional oversight hearings last Spring.

Both 1990 proposals suffer from the same basic deficiencies as their 1989 progenitors: the penalty levels were picked out of thin air, without regard to past sentencing practice and without regard to their potentially destructive impact on the economy. The entire approach is suffused with the basic policy error of divorcing the level of punishment from the rationale for criminal prohibitions.

How did the corporate sentencing proposals reach this low estate? In 1988 the Commission published a Discussion Draft that embodied an explicit social cost-benefit framework anchored by empirical findings. The backlash against that proposal led to the abortive 1989 proposals and, through them, to the current drafts. The 1990 drafts can best be understood as a reaction against the structure of the 1988 proposal and as a rejection of the empirical evidence developed in connection with that proposal.

Keywords: United States Sentencing Commission, sentencing commission

JEL Classification: K14, K22, K42

Suggested Citation

Parker, Jeffrey S., The Current Corporate Sentencing Proposals: History and Critique (1990). Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1990, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3565474

Jeffrey S. Parker (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
360
PlumX Metrics