Estimation Error and the 'Fundamental Law of Active Management' Is Quant Fundamentally Flawed?

The Journal of Investing, June 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2020.1.133

Posted: 16 Oct 2019 Last revised: 3 Apr 2020

Date Written: March 28, 2020

Abstract

According to widely referenced applications of the Grinold (1989) “Fundamental Law” theory, simply adding more securities to an optimization universe, adding more factors to a forecast return model, trading more frequently, or reducing more constraints can add investment value to an optimized investment strategy. We show with intuitive discussion followed by a novel simulation study that applications of the Grinold theory for optimized portfolio design are often unreliable and self-defeating. Critical limitations are due to ignoring estimation error (Michaud 1989) and constraints required in practical applications. A substantial fraction of professional actively managed funds may be negatively impacted.

Keywords: active management, portfolio construction, asset allocation, quantitative finance, Fundamental Law of Active Management, optimization

Suggested Citation

Michaud, Richard O. and Esch, David and Michaud, Robert, Estimation Error and the 'Fundamental Law of Active Management' Is Quant Fundamentally Flawed? (March 28, 2020). The Journal of Investing, June 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2020.1.133, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3456831 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3456831

David Esch

New Frontier Advisors ( email )

10 High Street, 8th floor
boston, MA 02110
United States
6174821433 (Phone)
6174821434 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.newfrontieradvisors.com

Robert Michaud

Independent ( email )

No contact information is available for Richard O. Michaud

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,155
PlumX Metrics