Investigating and Presenting an Alibi Defense

43 Pages Posted: 5 May 2020

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: April 9, 2020

Abstract

The New Jersey Supreme Court has said that “few defenses have greater potential for creating reasonable doubt as to a defendant's guilt in the minds of the [jurors than an alibi].” But is alibi a powerful defense, or a risky gambit with a high likelihood of backfiring?

In two-thirds of exoneration cases, the innocent defendant offered an alibi which was rejected by the fact finder. This article explores the psychology of autobiographical memory, how police and jurors perceive alibi witnesses, common interview and interrogation tactics, common cross-examination questions, and offers some guidance about how to better present this defense.

Keywords: Alibi, Autobiographical Memory, Interrogation, Cross-Examination

Suggested Citation

Steele, Lisa, Investigating and Presenting an Alibi Defense (April 9, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3572102 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572102

Lisa Steele (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
885
Abstract Views
3,969
Rank
52,906
PlumX Metrics