Comparative Analysis of Interim Injunctions under Section 9 and Section 17 under Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Gujarat Law Reports (2020)

12 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2020 Last revised: 13 Apr 2020

Date Written: March 14, 2020

Abstract

When a cause of action for seeking relief under section 9 has arisen at the pre-reference stage, and the relief under section 9 has been resorted to, the same can be continued or litigant can be asked to seek such a relief after the arbitral tribunal is duly constituted. However when a cause of action for seeking interim relief under section 9 is existing at the stage of pre-reference period, failure to invoke the said provision until and after the Constitution of arbitral tribunal shall have material bearing on the exercise of discretion by the tribunal in absence of any de novo cause of action.

The Remedy of Section 17 (1) (ii) b of Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 is a drastic measure required to be directed in rarest of rare cases and only upon established proof that assets are likely to be dissipated with a motive to defeat the claims and that the award will be rendered inexecutable.

Keywords: Arbitration, UNCITRAL, injunction, international commercial arbitration, contract, civil procedure

Suggested Citation

Shah, Dipen, Comparative Analysis of Interim Injunctions under Section 9 and Section 17 under Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (March 14, 2020). Gujarat Law Reports (2020) , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3554176

Dipen Shah (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

601 rajvi arcade drivein road ahmedabad
Ahmedabad
ahmedabad, Gujarat 382210
India

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
248
Abstract Views
822
Rank
310,057
PlumX Metrics