'Brexit' as a Frustrating Event and the Case of Canary Wharf v. European Medicine Agency

30 Pages Posted: 8 May 2020 Last revised: 11 May 2020

See all articles by Mitja Kovac

Mitja Kovac

University of Ljubljana School of Economics and Business

Paul Aubrecht

University of Passau

Date Written: April 1, 2020

Abstract

Lawyers and commercial contracting have been stressed by political uncertainty over the past four years. Brexit its uncertain outcome and the debate on the appropriate application of the frustration doctrine represent one of the most challenging issues for the current contract law scholarship and practitioners. This paper contributes to the extensive scholarly debate on whether the Brexit constitutes a frustration of purpose event in contracts by exploiting the findings of economic literature on the consequences of supervening events. Moreover, paper adds a novel conceptual framework for an improved legal intervention in case of supervening events where a court must decide whether a certain event classifies as a frustration of purpose and whether to discharge the promisor’s obligations. In addition, this paper offers a critical evaluation of the recent decision in Canary Wharf v European Medicines Agency.

Keywords: Frustration of purpose, supervening events, Brexit, contract law, optimal legal intervention

JEL Classification: C23, C26, C51, K42, O43

Suggested Citation

Kovac, Mitja and Aubrecht, Paul, 'Brexit' as a Frustrating Event and the Case of Canary Wharf v. European Medicine Agency (April 1, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3575463 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575463

Mitja Kovac (Contact Author)

University of Ljubljana School of Economics and Business ( email )

Kardeljeva ploscad 17
Ljubljana, 1000
Slovenia

Paul Aubrecht

University of Passau ( email )

Innstrasse 27
Passau, 94032
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
409
Abstract Views
1,492
Rank
178,563
PlumX Metrics