It Ain’t Necessarily So: A Legal Realist Perspective on the Law of Agency Work

Modern Law Review (2020)

31 Pages Posted: 11 May 2020 Last revised: 13 May 2020

See all articles by Amir Paz-Fuchs

Amir Paz-Fuchs

University of Sussex Law School

Date Written: January 16, 2020

Abstract

Analysis of UK employment and labour law is often characterised by a curious dissonance. The overarching narrative mandates that labour law is a countervailing force to the inequality of bargaining power, embedded with values and assumptions concerning the nature of employment relations and the role of labour law. And yet, labour law jurisprudence tends to treat with respect, and seeks to decipher, abstract statutory concepts and tests derived from judicial pronouncements as if they were, indeed, a ‘brooding omnipresence in the sky’. This paper seeks to bridge that gap, by offering a legal realist account of the legal doctrine that governs the employment of agency workers, focusing on the ‘necessity’ and ‘sham’ tests. It assesses the legitimacy of importing legal tests from one (commercial) context to another (employment) context; questions the courts’ protestations that their use is mandated by precedent; and outlines the real implications for the status and rights of agency workers in the UK.

Keywords: Agency work, employment status, legal realism

Suggested Citation

Paz-Fuchs, Amir, It Ain’t Necessarily So: A Legal Realist Perspective on the Law of Agency Work (January 16, 2020). Modern Law Review (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3577787

Amir Paz-Fuchs (Contact Author)

University of Sussex Law School ( email )

Falmer
Brighton BN1 9QE
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
257
PlumX Metrics