Redefining the Intended Copyright Infringer

53 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2020

Date Written: April 16, 2020

Abstract

In the mid-1970s, Paul Edmond Dowling and William SamuelTheaker ran an “extensive bootleg record operation.”[1] The two men made unauthorized “phonorecords of unreleased [Elvis] Presley recordings. . . [using] material from a variety of sources, including studio outtakes, acetates, soundtracks from Presley motion pictures, and tapes of Presley concerts and television appearances.”[2] Dowling was a huge Elvis Presley fan, so he “handled the ‘artistic’ end of the operation, contributing his knowledge of the Presley subculture, seeking out and selecting the musical material, designing the covers and labels, and writing the liner notes.”[3] Theaker, who lived in Los Angeles, handled the logistics of the operation. He “had some familiarity with the music industry, took care of the business end, arranging for the record pressings, distributing catalogs, and filling orders.”[4]

Suggested Citation

Liebesman, Yvette Joy, Redefining the Intended Copyright Infringer (April 16, 2020). Akron Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2017, Saint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-19, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3578132

Yvette Joy Liebesman (Contact Author)

Saint Louis University School of Law ( email )

100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO Missouri 63101
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.slu.edu/law/faculty/yvette-liebesman.php

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
420
PlumX Metrics