Vertical Restraints, the Single Market Imperative and UK Competition Policy after Brexit

18 Competition Law Journal 122 (2019)

16 Pages Posted: 18 May 2020

See all articles by Patrick Todd

Patrick Todd

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton

Date Written: September 1, 2019

Abstract

After Brexit, the United Kingdom is unlikely to continue pursuing integration with other member states of the European Union, including through competition policy. As a result, the time is ripe to reconsider the role of the single market imperative in competition law, in particular in relation to vertical restraints where the goal of market integration plays a pivotal role. This article shows that recent European vertical restraints decisions and case law, in particular concerning territorial and online restraints, have been motivated in whole or in part by the single market imperative (SMI). It then examines how the law in the UK might follow a different path post-Brexit, taking the recent Ping case as an example. However, a similar change is not likely to be forthcoming in relation to the law governing pricing restraints, which are not obviously linked to the SMI and which have been the subject of much enforcement in the UK both before and during the UK's membership of the EU.

Keywords: competition law, vertical restraints, Brexit, single market imperative, online sales bans

Suggested Citation

Todd, Patrick, Vertical Restraints, the Single Market Imperative and UK Competition Policy after Brexit (September 1, 2019). 18 Competition Law Journal 122 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3581868

Patrick Todd (Contact Author)

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton ( email )

2 London Wall Place
London, London EC2Y 5AU
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
292
Abstract Views
1,010
Rank
259,533
PlumX Metrics