Resolving the 'Dispute' Under Article 119(1) of the Rome Statute
Asian Journal of International Law, 10 (2020), pp. 38-49
11 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2020
Date Written: February 14, 2020
Abstract
The decision of the Office of the Prosecutor to seek a ruling in the “Bangladesh/Myanmar Situation” on jurisdiction under Article 19(3) of the Rome Statute was lauded for its drafting. The ICC granted the request in a very controversial judgment. This paper focuses on self-invocation and misinterpretation of Article 119(1) of the Statute (paragraph one disputes). The Court thus created and lost a unique chance to explain one of the untouched provisions of the Statute. The two paragraphs of the Article envisage different types of disputes. The Chamber was divided on the meaning of the very term “dispute”. However, what is noteworthy is that nowhere in her request had the Prosecutor accepted that there exists a dispute in this situation. In fact, the term “dispute” was not mentioned even once in her request. Why then did the Court delve into it?
Keywords: Dispute, ICC, OTP, Rohingya
JEL Classification: K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation