The Seen and the Unseen in Cost-Benefit Analysis

19 Pages Posted: 21 May 2020 Last revised: 20 Mar 2021

See all articles by James Broughel

James Broughel

America First Policy Institute (AFPI)

Date Written: March 19, 2021

Abstract

This paper explores the relevance of Bastiat’s famous distinction between the seen and the unseen consequences of actions to modern debates about cost-benefit analysis. In cost-benefit analysis, the opportunity cost of capital describes the unseen future returns a capital asset generates. However, there is no consensus among economists as to how to account for these returns, as disagreements are wrapped up in a broader controversy surrounding the correct social discount rate. The paper provides background on these debates and explains how adherents of the two mainstream discounting approaches both fail to live up to Bastiat’s standard of a “good economist.” The article concludes with discussion of the implications of this debate for selecting the appropriate social welfare function to be used in cost-benefit analysis.

Keywords: opportunity cost of capital, cost-benefit analysis, social discount rate, Austrian economics, subjectivism, social welfare function

JEL Classification: B53; D04; D61; H43

Suggested Citation

Broughel, James, The Seen and the Unseen in Cost-Benefit Analysis (March 19, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3585146 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3585146

James Broughel (Contact Author)

America First Policy Institute (AFPI) ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
172
Abstract Views
1,638
Rank
437,795
PlumX Metrics