Preprints with The Lancet is a collaboration between The Lancet Group of journals and SSRN to facilitate the open sharing of preprints for early engagement, community comment, and collaboration. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early-stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision-making or presented without highlighting these facts. For more information, please see the FAQs.
Testing of Safety and Ease of Use of an Adjusted Full Face Snorkel Mask as Protective Measure for Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic – MASK Study
16 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2020
More...Abstract
Introduction: During the Covid-19 pandemic healthcare workers are at risk of getting infected or to become ‘super spreaders’. In times of equipment shortage, many have been looking at alternative, reusable equipment to serve in a medical setting, often after some adaptations. Full face snorkel masks have been used for positive pressure ventilation and more recently as a protective device. The advantage of using these adapted masks as a protective measure is the reusable combination of a face shield and a protective mask. This interventional study was carried out to ensure its safety while performing normal healthcare tasks.
Materials and Methods: 40 health care workers were voluntarily recruited to wear an adapted full face diving mask during 2 hours of normal work. A questionnaire evaluated general demographics. Clinical parameters and arterial blood gas analysis were performed prior to initiating the study and after 15 and 120 minutes. A questionnaire evaluated the comfort and usability of the masks at 15 and 120 minutes.
Results: There were no significant changes in parameters of blood gasses after 15 and 120 minutes. Other statistically different parameters were not of clinical relevance. The masks were well tolerated although a small but a statistical disadvantage was noted as time progressed. At 120 minutes 17% of participants had a score of more than 5/10 on RPE (Ratings of Perceived Exertion) reflecting a disadvantage. The main disadvantages were ‘difficulties to communicate’, ‘sweating’ and ‘visual difficulties’ including ‘limited view on the bottom’ and ‘not being able to wear their glasses’.
Conclusions: The full face diving masks are safe to use during normal work activities at the hospital during a time period of 2 hours. They are well tolerated but its perceived comfort is negatively correlated to time. We plan to perform a prospective trial assessing the comfort of standard protective equipment compared to the masks. As fit tests are looking promising, the implementation of the mask as a protective device against viral particles could be near. The reusable masks might be a safe and less expensive protective solution for healthcare workers.
Funding Statement: None to declare
Declaration of Interests: All authors certify that they have no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript.
Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by the ethics committee of AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, reference number 2645. For this type of study formal informed consent was obtained from each included patient.
Keywords: COVID-19, Protective equipment, mask, caregiver, infection prevention
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation