The Revitalisation of the Object and Purpose of the TRIPS Agreement: The Plain Packaging Reports and the Awakening of the TRIPS Flexibility Clauses

in: Jonathan Griffiths and Tuomas Mylly (eds), “Global Intellectual Property Protection and New Constitutionalism”, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 267-294.

Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No. 2020-01

48 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2020 Last revised: 22 Nov 2021

See all articles by Christophe Geiger

Christophe Geiger

Luiss Guido Carli University

Luc Desaunettes-Barbero

Catholic University of Louvain (UCL); Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition; University of Strasbourg - CEIPI

Date Written: March 18, 2020

Abstract

The limited role the objectives and principles of the TRIPS Agreement (Articles 7 and 8) have played so far in the interpretation and implementation of its substantive provisions has often been criticised. The WTO Panel and Appellate Body Reports in the “Australia - Plain Packaging” dispute are likely to change this situation for the future, as for the first time the WTO dispute settlement bodies fully engage with Articles 7 and 8 of TRIPS to interpret Article 20 relative to the use of trademarks. It is indeed the reliance on these two provisions that allows the Panel and the Appellate Body to conclude that there are legitimate reasons for which Members may encumber trademark use. The awakening of these two provisions that have long remained dormant in the Agreement could have a fundamental impact in offering the possibility of a more flexible reading of TRIPS. It could indeed secure the adaptability of intellectual property rights to the evolution of economic, technological and social circumstances by guaranteeing a more balanced interpretation of the limitations and exceptions included in the Agreement, as advocated for example several years ago by a group of international IP scholars in the “Declaration on a balanced interpretation of the three-step test”. Furthermore, the use of these two provisions could serve as a gateway for the taking into account ethical imperatives supported by international human rights in the interpretation of the TRIPS norms. If such a reading has been advocated in the past, the “Plain Packaging”- Reports might lead in the future to a more frequent and welcomed raising of human rights arguments in the context of international trade law.

Keywords: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Articles 7 and 8 TRIPS, ADPIC, Australia - Plain Packaging decision

Suggested Citation

Geiger, Christophe and Desaunettes-Barbero, Luc, The Revitalisation of the Object and Purpose of the TRIPS Agreement: The Plain Packaging Reports and the Awakening of the TRIPS Flexibility Clauses (March 18, 2020). in: Jonathan Griffiths and Tuomas Mylly (eds), “Global Intellectual Property Protection and New Constitutionalism”, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. 267-294., Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No. 2020-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3556585 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556585

Christophe Geiger (Contact Author)

Luiss Guido Carli University ( email )

Department of Law, Viale Pola 12
Rome, Roma 00198
Italy

HOME PAGE: http://www.luiss.edu/faculty/353993

Luc Desaunettes-Barbero

Catholic University of Louvain (UCL) ( email )

Place Montesquieu, 3
Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348
Belgium

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Herzog-Max-Straße 4
Munich, Bayern 80333
Germany

University of Strasbourg - CEIPI ( email )

Bâtiment LE CARDO, 7 Rue de l'Ecarlate
CS 20024
Strasbourg, 67082
France

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
758
Abstract Views
3,072
Rank
82,638
PlumX Metrics