Employment Protection Legislation and the Macroeconomy: Evidence from Brazil

57 Pages Posted: 27 May 2020 Last revised: 28 May 2020

See all articles by David Arnold

David Arnold

Princeton University; Princeton University - Department of Economics

Joshua Bernstein

Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Economics

Date Written: April 29, 2020

Abstract

This paper exploits tenure-dependence in the design of employment protection legislation (EPL) to identify its equilibrium impacts. In our setting, Brazil, EPL applies after a three-month probationary period, incentivizing firms to terminate jobs at exactly 3 months. We develop a structural model in which firms learn about match quality to map this effect on job termination to equilibrium macroeconomic outcomes. We find that EPL without a probationary period leads to a 2.4 percent increase in unemployment and 3.3 percent decrease in output. However, introducing a probationary period completely negates these effects by effectively increasing the value of an initial match.

Keywords: Employment Protection, Efficiency, Job Separation Hazard

JEL Classification: J63, J65, J68

Suggested Citation

Arnold, David and Bernstein, Joshua, Employment Protection Legislation and the Macroeconomy: Evidence from Brazil (April 29, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3588598 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3588598

David Arnold (Contact Author)

Princeton University ( email )

22 Chambers Street
Princeton, NJ 08544-0708
United States

Princeton University - Department of Economics ( email )

Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
United States

Joshua Bernstein

Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Economics ( email )

Wylie Hall
Bloomington, IN 47405-6620
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
572
Rank
891,180
PlumX Metrics