Should We Be Puzzled by Forward Guidance?

43 Pages Posted: 29 May 2020

See all articles by FRB of Kansas City Submitter

FRB of Kansas City Submitter

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Brent Bundick

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Andrew Smith

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Date Written: April 1, 2020

Abstract

Although a growing literature argues output is too sensitive to future interest rates in standard macroeconomic models, little empirical evidence has been put forth to evaluate this claim. In this paper, we use a range of vector autoregression models to answer the central question of how much output responds to changes in interest rate expectations following a monetary policy shock. Despite distinct identification strategies and sample periods, we find surprising agreement regarding this elasticity across empirical models. We then show that in a standard model of nominal rigidity estimated using impulse response matching, forward guidance shocks produce an elasticity of output with respect to expected interest rates similar to our empirical estimates. Our results suggest that standard macroeconomic models do not overstate the observed sensitivity of output to expected interest rates.

Keywords: Forward Guidance, Monetary Policy Shocks, Zero Lower Bound, Impulse Response Matching

JEL Classification: E32, E52

Suggested Citation

Submitter, FRB of Kansas City and Bundick, Brent and Smith, Andrew, Should We Be Puzzled by Forward Guidance? (April 1, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3590696 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590696

Frb Of Kansas City Submitter (Contact Author)

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

1 Memorial Drive
Kansas City, MO 64198
United States

Brent Bundick

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City ( email )

1 Memorial Dr.
Kansas City, MO 64198
United States

Andrew Smith

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City ( email )

1 Memorial Dr.
Kansas City, MO 64198
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
553
Rank
796,622
PlumX Metrics