The Crime Victim's Right to Attend the Trial: The Reascendant National Consensus

67 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2005

See all articles by Douglas Evan Beloof

Douglas Evan Beloof

Lewis and Clark Law School

Paul G. Cassell

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Abstract

This article contends that crime victims should have an unequivocal right to attend a criminal trial, even in cases where they will be called as witnesses. A victim's right to attend trial has strong historical support, as at common law victims attended trial as private prosecutors. More recently, crime victims' rights legislation passed in the majority of states recognizes the victim's right to attend. Nothing in the Constitution prevents victims from attending trial, and strong public policy reasons support such an approach. Observing the trial can have import therapeutic and other benefits for victims. Any risk of prejudice to a defendant from the possibility of a victim "tailoring" testimony to that of other witnesses can be solved through such means as requiring the victim to testify first and permitting thorough cross-examination by defense counsel.

Suggested Citation

Beloof, Douglas Evan and Cassell, Paul G., The Crime Victim's Right to Attend the Trial: The Reascendant National Consensus. Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 9, p. 481, 2005, U of Utah Legal Studies Paper No. 05-33, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=843146

Douglas Evan Beloof (Contact Author)

Lewis and Clark Law School ( email )

10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219-7799
United States
503-768-6749 (Phone)

Paul G. Cassell

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
801-585-5202 (Phone)
801-581-6897 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
Abstract Views
1,716
Rank
337,329
PlumX Metrics