Credit Card Interchange Fees: Three Decades of Antitrust Uncertainty
92 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2007 Last revised: 5 Aug 2008
Abstract
This article re-examines the historical, economic, and legal analyses of credit card interchange fees, rejecting the standard assumptions that (1) collectively set interchange fees are unlikely to harm consumers and (2) these fees cannot feasibly be set in a competitive fashion. Through a new historical assessment and consideration of the most recent economic learning, this article shows that under current market conditions collusively set interchange fees are likely to harm consumers and thus violate the antitrust laws. In addition, a competitive remedy is feasible. The six largest Visa and MasterCard issuers, which are larger than the Discover Card System and thus large enough to run their own systems, could be required to set their own interchange fees. Smaller issuers in the Visa and MasterCard systems could continue to set interchange fees collectively.
Keywords: credit card, interchange fee, antitrust, collusion, price fixing, two-sided market, bank, issuer, acquirer
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Mergers in Two-Sided Markets: An Application to the Canadian Newspaper Industry
-
Insulated Platform Competition
By Alexander White and E. Glen Weyl
-
Platform Pricing at Sports Card Conventions
By Ginger Zhe Jin and Marc Rysman
-
The First-Order Approach to Merger Analysis
By Sonia Jaffe and E. Glen Weyl
-
By Lapo Filistrucchi, Tobias J. Klein, ...
-
Estimating Platform Market Power in Two-Sided Markets with an Application to Magazine Advertising
By Minjae Song
-
Merger Simulation in a Two-Sided Market: The Case of the Dutch Daily Newspapers
By Lapo Filistrucchi, Tobias J. Klein, ...
-
By David S. Evans and Michael D. Noel
-
By David S. Evans and Michael D. Noel