Outcome, Process & Power in Direct Democracy New Econometric Results
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics Working Paper No. 25, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 222
30 Pages Posted: 20 Mar 2000
Date Written: December 1999
Abstract
Based on survey data for Switzerland, new empirical findings on direct democracy are presented. In the first part, we show that, on average, public employees receive lower financial compensation under more direct democratic institutions. However, top bureaucrats are more constrained in direct democracies and have to be compensated by higher wages for that loss of power. In the second part, we demonstrate that reported subjective well-being of the population is much higher in jurisdictions with stronger direct democratic rights. This is not only the case because people value political outcomes higher but they derive utility from the politcal process itself.
Keywords: Direct democracy, power, compensating wage differentials, satisfaction with life, process utility
JEL Classification: H73, I31, J45, J32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Ed Diener
-
What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Culture and Subjective Well-Being
By William Tov and Ed Diener
-
A Note on Unhappiness and Unemployment Duration
By Andrew Clark
-
Happiness, Economy and Institutions
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress
By Ed Diener, Eunkook Suh, ...
-
Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?
By Alberto F. Alesina, Rafael Di Tella, ...