Debt and Taxes: Evidence from the Real Estate Industry
48 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2012
Date Written: April 6, 2012
Abstract
Compelling empirical evidence documenting a material effect of corporate taxes on leverage decisions is limited, in part because of difficulties in constructing an effective proxy for the firm’s tax benefit of debt. We examine leverage decisions across taxable and nontaxable real estate firms — firms for which we can measure the relative tax benefit of debt with little error. The tax hypothesis implies that for firms with similar asset portfolios, taxable firms should have more debt than their nontaxable counterparts. We find that leverage ratios of taxable real estate firms are about 5% higher than their nontaxable counterparts, but this estimate is only one-third what would be expected given recent evidence using simulated marginal tax rates.
Keywords: Capital structure, taxes, marginal tax rates, organizational form
JEL Classification: G32, H25, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Jay C. Hartzell, Libo Sun, ...
-
By Jay C. Hartzell, Crocker H. Liu, ...
-
Insider Ownership and Firm Value: Evidences from Real Estate Investment Trusts
By Bing Han