The Case Against Moral Luck

33 Pages Posted: 18 May 2015 Last revised: 5 Jun 2015

See all articles by David Enoch

David Enoch

Hebrew University - The Philosophy Department and the Law School

Andrei Marmor

Cornell University - Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 4, 2015

Abstract

In this paper we set out to defend the claim that there is not – and indeed there can be no – moral luck. We do this by noting the powerful reasons to deny the existence of moral luck, but mostly by criticizing what are widely considered to be the reasons to admit moral luck into one’s moral theory. The intuitive strength of the control condition on moral culpability, together with the many weaknesses of purported examples of moral luck, make a powerful case against moral luck.

Keywords: Moral luck

Suggested Citation

Enoch, David and Marmor, Andrei, The Case Against Moral Luck (June 4, 2015). Law and Philosophy 26(4) (2006), 405-436., USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 15-15, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2607184

David Enoch (Contact Author)

Hebrew University - The Philosophy Department and the Law School ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

Andrei Marmor

Cornell University - Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/faculty/bio_andrei_marmor.cfm

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
878
Rank
36,109
PlumX Metrics