The Swedish Model of Corporate Ownership and Control in Transition
WHO WILL OWN EUROPE? THE INTERNATIONALISATION OF ASSET OWNERSHIP IN EUROPE, Harry Huizinga, Lars Jonung, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2005
63 Pages Posted: 5 Jul 2007
Abstract
We analyze the development of the Swedish ownership model after World War II. The controlling ownership in Swedish firms is typically concentrated to one or two owners. Often, but not always, the controlling owners are Swedish families. Thus, the model resembles the typical corporate control model of Continental Europe. A distinguishing feature of the Swedish model is that control is typically based on a smaller capital base than in other European countries. This feature is a result of a seemingly paradoxical policy concerning private ownership. Tax policy has consistently disfavored the accumulation of private wealth, but at the same time corporate law has greatly facilitated the wielding of control based on a small equity base.
Our analysis shows that the large gap between ownership and control makes the Swedish corporate control model both politically and economically unstable.
The major political threat to date has been the proposal of the Swedish Trade Union Congress (the LO) and the Social Democratic Party to introduce a scheme that would result in the gradual takeover of the Swedish corporate sector by union-controlled wage-earner funds.
After the political defeat of this proposal in the 1980's economic policy was changed in a more market liberal direction. This policy change has uncovered the economic instability of the model. The weak financial base of the controlling owners makes it difficult for them to take an active part in the current international restructuring of the corporate sector. Two forces are now seen as the major threat to the Swedish ownership model: (a) a rapidly increasing foreign takeover of Swedish firms and (b) large state and corporatist pension funds. Their financial assets are far larger than those of today's dominant control owners and extensive mandatory and/or tax-favored systems for pensions saving ascertain that their relative financial strength will continue to grow sharply in the future.
Keywords: Corporate control, Corporate governance, Corporatism, Entrepreneurship, Ownership policy, Ownership structure, Swedish Model
JEL Classification: M13, N24, O38, P16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Explaining National Differences in the Size and Industry Distribution of Employment
By Steven J. Davis and Magnus Henrekson
-
Explaining National Differences in the Size and Industry Distribution of Employment
By Steven J. Davis and Magnus Henrekson
-
The Effects on Sick Leave of Changes in the Sickness Insurance System
By Magnus Henrekson and Mats Persson
-
Wage-Setting Institutions as Industrial Policy
By Steven J. Davis and Magnus Henrekson
-
Wage-Setting Institutions as Industrial Policy
By Steven J. Davis and Magnus Henrekson
-
Employer Size and the Wage Structure in U.S. Manufacturing
By Steven J. Davis and John Haltiwanger
-
Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-Based Entrepreneurship: Lessons from the US and Sweden
By Magnus Henrekson and Nathan Rosenberg
-
Gazelles as Job Creators - A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence
By Magnus Henrekson and Dan Johansson
-
Industrial Policy, Employer Size, and Economic Performance in Sweden
By Steven J. Davis and Magnus Henrekson