Do Mandatory Pensions Decrease Household Savings? Evidence for the Netherlands
32 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2000 Last revised: 16 Apr 2023
Abstract
The Dutch mandatory pension system consists of two parts: a public pay-as-you-go part that provides a minimum income to all Dutch inhabitants over age 64; and an occupation-specific capital-funded part that provides supplementary retirement income. The goal of this paper is to test for the effect of mandatory pensions on discretionary household savings. The data are drawn from the CentER Savings Survey, which consists of a representative and a highest-income-decile sample of Dutch households. The survey contains rich information on house-hold wealth, pension rights and savings attitudes. A result of the empirical analysis is that the impact of the public part of the Dutch pension system is not well identified. The occupational pensions have a significant negative impact on savings motives with respect to old age. Concerning the effect on household wealth, evidence is mixed. Only in the highest-income-decile sample there is evidence for a significantly negative impact of occupational pensions.
Keywords: Savings, life cycle hypothesis, pensions
JEL Classification: C21, D91, H55
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Loan and Bond Finance in Argentina, 1985-2005
By Roque Benjamin Fernandez, Celeste González, ...
-
Spillovers to Emerging Equity Markets: An Econometric Assessment
By L. Effie Psalida and Tao Sun
-
Pension Reform and Fiscal Policy: Some Lessons from Chile
By Ángel Melguizo, Ángel Muñoz, ...