lancet-header

Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com.

Adequate Responses to an Acellular Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Children, Adolescents, and Young and Older Adults: A Collaborative Study in Finland, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom

34 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2020

See all articles by Pauline Versteegen

Pauline Versteegen

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

Marta Valente Pinto

University of Oxford - Oxford Vaccine Group

Alex M. Barkoff

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology

Pieter G.M. van Gageldonk

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

Jan van de Kassteele

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

Marlies A. van Houten

Spaarne Gasthuis Academy

Elisabeth A.M. Sanders

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

Sagida Bibi

University of Oxford - Centre for Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine

Raakel Luoto

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology

Qiushui He

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology

Anne-Marie Buisman

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

Dominic F. Kelly

University of Oxford - Department of Paediatrics

Jussi Mertsola

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology

Guy A. M. Berbers

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

More...

Abstract

Background: Pertussis can lead to serious disease and even death in infants. In addition older adults and patients with chronic diseases are more vulnerable to complications. In high-income countries, priming vaccination in infancy is usually undertaken using acellular pertussis vaccines. There is a significant between-country variation in the use of booster vaccinations which are administered at different ages and to different target populations. We investigated the effect of age on the response to acellular pertussis booster vaccination in three European countries.

Methods: In total 379 participants, divided between four age groups - children (7-10y), adolescents (11-15y), young adults (20-34y), and older adults (60-70y) -  received a pertussis toxoid, filamentous haemagglutinin, and pertactin containing booster vaccine. Serum IgG and IgA antibody concentrations to pertussis vaccine antigens at day 0, day 28, and one year were measured with a multiplex immunoassay.

Findings: Participants from all four age groups showed high IgG antibodies to pertussis toxin at day 28. IgG antibody concentrations at 28 days and one year postvaccination were comparable between the age groups, but IgA concentrations showed an increase of antibody concentrations with age at all timepoints.

Interpretation: Acellular pertussis booster vaccination induces comparable serological responses in older adults as younger age groups and could be considered for older adults in order to increase their protection.

Trial Registration: The trial was registered at the EU Clinical Trial database (EudraCT number 2016-003678-42).

Funding: PERISCOPE has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 115910. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, EFPIA and BMGF.

Declaration of Interests: None of the authors received payment or service from a third part at any time, nor does anyone have a financial relationship with entities in the bio-medical arena. None of the authors have any patents relevant to the work. MVP is a member of the Portuguese National Immunisation Technical Advisory Group (Comissão Técnica de Vacinação da Direcção Geral de Saúde).

Ethics Approval Statement: The trial was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U, NL60807.100.17-R17.039) in the Netherlands, the South Central - Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee (REC, 19/SC/0368) in the UK, and the MREC UTU (ETMK Dnro: 129/1800/2017) in Finland. Written informed consent was obtained from all adult participants, and parents or legal guardian of minors, at the start of the study.

Keywords: Vaccination, Pertussis, IgG, IgA, Children, Adults

Suggested Citation

Versteegen, Pauline and Valente Pinto, Marta and Barkoff, Alex M. and van Gageldonk, Pieter G.M. and van de Kassteele, Jan and van Houten, Marlies A. and Sanders, Elisabeth A.M. and Bibi, Sagida and Luoto, Raakel and He, Qiushui and Buisman, Anne-Marie and Kelly, Dominic F. and Mertsola, Jussi and Berbers, Guy A. M., Adequate Responses to an Acellular Pertussis Booster Vaccination in Children, Adolescents, and Young and Older Adults: A Collaborative Study in Finland, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3708334 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3708334

Pauline Versteegen

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control ( email )

Bilthoven
Netherlands

Marta Valente Pinto

University of Oxford - Oxford Vaccine Group ( email )

United Kingdom

Alex M. Barkoff

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology ( email )

Turku
Finland

Pieter G.M. Van Gageldonk

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control ( email )

Bilthoven
Netherlands

Jan Van de Kassteele

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control ( email )

Bilthoven
Netherlands

Marlies A. Van Houten

Spaarne Gasthuis Academy ( email )

Elisabeth A.M. Sanders

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control ( email )

Bilthoven
Netherlands

Sagida Bibi

University of Oxford - Centre for Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine ( email )

Oxford
United Kingdom

Raakel Luoto

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology ( email )

Turku
Finland

Qiushui He

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology ( email )

Turku
Finland

Anne-Marie Buisman

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control ( email )

Bilthoven
Netherlands

Dominic F. Kelly

University of Oxford - Department of Paediatrics ( email )

Jussi Mertsola

University of Turku - Institute of Biomedicine, Microbiology, Virology and Immunology ( email )

Turku
Finland

Guy A. M. Berbers (Contact Author)

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) - Centre for Infectious Disease Control

Bilthoven
Netherlands