Did Colonization Matter for Growth? An Empirical Exploration into the Historical Causes of Africa's Underdevelopment
Economics Working Paper 202
25 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 1997
There are 2 versions of this paper
Did Colonization Matter for Growth? An Empirical Exploration into the Historical Causes of Africa's Underdevelopment
Abstract
We investigate the impact of 20th--century European colonization on growth in Africa. We find that in the 1960--88 period growth has been faster for dependencies than for colonies; for British and French colonies than for Portuguese, Belgian and Italian ones; and for countries with less economic penetration during the colonial period. On average, African growth accelerates after decolonization. Proxies for colonial heritage add explanatory power to growth regressions and make indicators for human capital, political and ethnic instability lose significance. Colonial variables capture the same effects of a sub--Saharan dummy and reduce its significance when jointly included in a cross sectional regression with 98 countries.
JEL Classification: E00, O40, Q32, N10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation
By Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, ...
-
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation
By Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, ...
-
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation
By Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, ...
-
By Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, ...
-
By Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, ...
-
By Dani Rodrik, Arvind Subramanian, ...
-
By Dani Rodrik, Arvind Subramanian, ...
-
By Dani Rodrik, Arvind Subramanian, ...
-
Geography and Economic Development
By John Luke Gallup, Jeffrey D. Sachs, ...