Internal Rate of Return Revisited
17 Pages Posted: 5 May 1997
Date Written: October 1995
Abstract
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) includes the present value (PV) (or net present value (NPV)) and the internal rate of return (IRR) methods of analyzing cash flows. DCF provides insight into financial management not possible using other techniques. The NPV of the time-phased costs over the economic life of an investment project is the best single-number measure of its life-cycle cost. NPV is used extensively. IRR is used much less so, then only with considerable unwarranted caution. The major reason for IRR not being used centers on the extensive criticism of IRR found in corporate finance and financial management textbooks. These criticisms overstate the minor difficulties associated with IRR, understate the coexistent difficulties with NPV, and are the focus this paper. The aim is to put the criticisms of IRR into perspective and put the two DCF measures into balance. This paper critically examines the professed reasons for the superiority of NPV over IRR in financial decision making.
JEL Classification: G31, G32, G11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg
-
By Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg
-
Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks Versus Stock Markets
By Ronald J. Gilson and Bernard S. Black
-
Money Chasing Deals?: The Impact of Fund Inflows on Private Equity Valuations
By Paul A. Gompers and Josh Lerner
-
Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows
-
Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital
-
The Returns to Entrepreneurial Investment: A Private Equity Premium Puzzle?
-
Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence
By Thomas F. Hellmann and Manju Puri