Syndicated Loans and CDS Positioning

47 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2020

See all articles by Iñaki Aldasoro

Iñaki Aldasoro

Bank for International Settlements (BIS)

Andreas Barth

Goethe University Frankfurt - Department of Finance; Halle Institute for Economic Research; Saarland University

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November, 2017

Abstract

This paper analyzes banks’ usage of CDS. Combining bank-firm syndicated loan data with a unique EU-wide dataset on bilateral CDS positions, we find that stronger banks in terms of capital, funding and profitability tend to hedge more. We find no evidence of banks using the CDS market for capital relief. Banks are more likely to hedge exposures to relatively riskier borrowers and less likely to sell CDS protection on domestic firms. Lead arrangers tend to buy more protection, potentially exacerbating asymmetric information problems. Dealer banks seem insensitive to firm risk, and hedge more than non-dealers when they are more profitable. These results allow for a better understanding of banks’ credit risk management.

Keywords: asymmetric information, capital regulation, CDS, cross-border lending, EMIR, speculation, syndicated loans

JEL Classification: G21, G28

Suggested Citation

Aldasoro, Iñaki and Barth, Andreas, Syndicated Loans and CDS Positioning (November, 2017). ESRB: Working Paper Series No. 2017/58, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3723405 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3723405

Iñaki Aldasoro (Contact Author)

Bank for International Settlements (BIS) ( email )

Centralbahnplatz 2
Basel, Basel-Stadt 4002
Switzerland

Andreas Barth

Goethe University Frankfurt - Department of Finance ( email )

Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3
Frankfurt, 60629
Germany

Halle Institute for Economic Research ( email )

P.O. Box 11 03 61
Kleine Maerkerstrasse 8
D-06017 Halle, 06108
Germany

Saarland University ( email )

Stadtwald
Saarbrucken, Saarland D-66123
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
440
PlumX Metrics