Accounting for Productivity: Is it Ok to Assume that the World is Cobb-Douglas?
33 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2008
Date Written: June 26, 2008
Abstract
The development accounting literature almost always assumes a Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function. However, if in reality the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor deviates substantially from 1, the assumption is invalid, potentially casting doubt on the commonly held view that factors of production are relatively unimportant in accounting for differences in labor productivity. We use international data on relative factor shares and capital-output ratios to formulate a number of tests for the validity of the CD assumption. We find that the CD specification performs reasonably well for the purposes of cross-country productivity accounting.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models
By William Easterly and Ross Levine
-
Is Growth Exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer and Weil Seriously
-
Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth
By Robert J. Barro, N. Gregory Mankiw, ...
-
Relative Prices and Relative Prosperity
By Chang-tai Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
By Jonathan Eaton and Samuel S. Kortum
-
The Tyranny of Concepts: Cudie (Cumulated, Depreciated Investment Effort) is Not Capital