Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory

CONTESTED CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTIONS ON THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, University of British Columbia Press, 2009

23 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2008 Last revised: 8 Dec 2009

See all articles by Grant Huscroft

Grant Huscroft

University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has become the dominant feature of the Canadian Constitution, and the power of the Supreme Court of Canada has grown enormously in the twenty-five years since the Charter was entrenched. The Court is the self-styled guardian of the constitution, and the other branches of government have acquiesced in its claim to the mantle. Few see any distinction between the Court and the Charter itself: the Charter's vaguely worded rights and freedoms are supposed to mean whatever the Court says they do.

Dialogue theory rationalizes this world of judicial interpretive supremacy by exaggerating the power of the elected branches to respond to judicial decisions striking down legislation. The 'dialogue' Canadian theorists have in mind is one in which the Court is free to interpret the Charter as it will, while Canadian legislatures are required to adopt the Court's interpretation and act within such parameters as its decisions allow. But this is not a dialogue in any meaningful sense. Canada's experience with the regulation of tobacco advertising demonstrates how misleading dialogue theory can be.

Keywords: Judicial review, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Dialogue Theory

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Huscroft, Grant, Rationalizing Judicial Power: The Mischief of Dialogue Theory (2008). CONTESTED CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTIONS ON THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, University of British Columbia Press, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1083685

Grant Huscroft (Contact Author)

University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Law ( email )

London, Ontario N6A 3K7 N6A 3K7
Canada
519-661-2111 ext 88375 (Phone)
519-661-3790 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,187
Abstract Views
4,353
Rank
32,962
PlumX Metrics