Labor Law and Employment Regulation: Neoclassical and Institutional Perspectives
96 Pages Posted: 31 Aug 2008
Date Written: July 2008
Abstract
This paper provides an in-depth economic analysis of the pros and cons of labor law and employment regulation. Two law and economics movements are identified in the USA: the first is the well-known post-World War II law and economics movement centered in neoclassical economics and the University of Chicago; the second is the largely unknown and neglected pre-World II law and economics movement centered in institutional economics and the University of Wisconsin. The former mostly provides the con side to employment regulation, the latter mostly provides the pro side. The paper describes the assumptions, methods and theories of each school of thought and their implications regarding the optimal form and extent of labor law and employment regulation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Gary Becker's Contributions to Family and Household Economics
-
Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?
By Bruno S. Frey and Stephan Meier
-
Language, Learning, and Location
By Andrew John and Kei-mu Yi
-
From Imperialism to Inspiration: A Survey of Economics and Psychology
By Bruno S. Frey and Matthias Benz
-
Do Good Laws Make Good Citizens? An Economic Analysis of Internalizing Legal Values
-
The Institutional Theory of John R. Commons: Foundation for a Heterodox Labor Economics