It's the Economy (and Combined Ratio) Stupid: Examining the Medical Malpractice Litigation 'Crisis' Myth and the Factors Critical to Reform

37 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2008

See all articles by Mitchell J. Nathanson

Mitchell J. Nathanson

Villanova University - Charles Widger School of Law

Date Written: September 16, 2004

Abstract

This article examines the recurring medical malpractice litigation crisis with an eye toward pinpointing the elusive source of the problem. My thesis is that these crises have recurred every decade or so and will continue to recur indefinitely because the root cause has never been specifically identified. As a result, it is no surprise that reform attempts have proven to be universally ineffective. It is my conclusion that malpractice litigation reform has repeatedly failed because, contrary to the widely held view, there has never been a medical malpractice litigation crisis, per se. Rather, there have been cyclical insurance crises through the years; crises that have more to do with fluctuations of the bond market than anything associated with medical malpractice litigation. This is not to suggest, however, that malpractice litigation costs in no way affect physicians' premium rates, and, consequently, the availability of quality health care to the public. To the contrary, these costs significantly affect premium rates in years in which the bond market is weak. As a result, it is necessary that reform measures be taken which stabilize these costs in order to correct an insurance system which presently reacts violently in response to market fluctuations. This article examines both the traditional, widely held view regarding the root cause of the malpractice crisis which holds a perceived medical malpractice litigation explosion accountable, as well as the emerging view which focuses instead on the interplay of the insurance industry and the bond market, in order to determine the true cause of the problem. Next, it analyzes the most historically popular methods of reform (i.e., the imposition of jury verdict caps and the creation of medical malpractice screening/arbitration panels) in an attempt to explain why, despite good intentions, they have repeatedly failed. Finally, this article proposes a solution to the problem, one which responds to the root cause of these recurring crises.

Keywords: medical malpractice, health care, combined ratio, insurance, health care reform, medical malpractice reform

Suggested Citation

Nathanson, Mitchell J., It's the Economy (and Combined Ratio) Stupid: Examining the Medical Malpractice Litigation 'Crisis' Myth and the Factors Critical to Reform (September 16, 2004). Penn State Law Review, Vol. 108, No. 1077, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1268901

Mitchell J. Nathanson (Contact Author)

Villanova University - Charles Widger School of Law ( email )

299 N. Spring Mill Road
Villanova, PA 19085
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
620
Rank
576,227
PlumX Metrics