Book Review: Religion in Criminal Justice by Monica K. Miller

11 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2009

See all articles by Geraldine Szott Moohr

Geraldine Szott Moohr

University of Houston Law Center

Roger Sherman

University of Houston

Date Written: January 29, 2009

Abstract

Do appeals to religious values during closing arguments of capital cases influence juror's decisions to impose the death penalty? Based on experiments with mock jurors, Monica K. Miller is willing to conclude that religious appeals do not interfere with jurors' sentencing decisions. But the religious appeals she presents to mock jurors are based on weak written summaries of cases rather than, say, dramatic presentations, so their failure will not support a general conclusion about the effect of religious appeals. More accurately, her studies show that religious appeals - as represented in written summaries - do not interfere with juror's sentencing decisions in death penalty cases. Miller's work provides preliminary results, and the main question about effects of appeals to religious values remains unanswered.

Keywords: death penalty, capital punishment, jurors, penalty phase, religion

Suggested Citation

Moohr, Geraldine Szott and Sherman, Roger, Book Review: Religion in Criminal Justice by Monica K. Miller (January 29, 2009). Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 24, 2009, U of Houston Law Center No. 2009-A-9, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1334812

Geraldine Szott Moohr (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

Roger Sherman

University of Houston ( email )

4800 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
1,098
Rank
642,696
PlumX Metrics