Protecting 'Public Interest' in Modernised Skies

The 5TH International Conference on Accounting, Auditing & Management in Public Sector Reforms, Amsterdam

31 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2009

See all articles by Alan Jones

Alan Jones

affiliation not provided to SSRN

James Guthrie

Macquarie University - Department of Accounting and Finance; University Of Bologna - Department of Management; Macquarie University, Macquarie Business School

Date Written: September 3, 2008

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to critique the modernization of an essential public service - Air Navigation Services (ANS) - since the early 1980s. The paper focuses on the changes to the financial management and accountability regimes of four Anglo-American ANS providers.

Frederickson and Smith (2003) state that lines of political control and hierarchical authority have been strained by the devolution of regulatory policy to autonomous entities. Traditional notions of parliamentary accountability have suffered with the emergence of collaborative forms of governance and alternative delivery systems. Nevertheless, the public holds government ultimately responsible for the performance of ANS providers. In order to protect the 'public interest' while maintaining arm's length control, various governments have introduced 'managerialist' instruments of accounting, budgetary control, auditing and quality assurance (Lapsley, 2008).

The modernization of ANS are examined using Considine's (2001) governance models and the financial management and accountability technologies utilized to implement control and monitor change. Fundamental issues in the financial management reforms are accountability, accounting and reporting, and performance monitoring (English et al., 2005, p. 23).

A contextual, historical view of ANS from the mid 1980s to 2007 is provided with a view to identifying and accounting for the pattern of similarities and differences in reform trajectories. The findings from the four cases studied highlight a move away from ex ante controls (rules), towards ex post control systems in which outcomes are held up to scrutiny through financial reporting mechanisms. Data reveals a significant increase in the use of quantitative performance indicators (PI) and performance audit. However, their prevalence and type are not uniform across all governance models for ANS.

In conclusion, it is argued that there is no single model of public service modernization. In practice, the diffusion and adoption of new reform doctrines varies from one location to another, reflecting the different weightings attached by reformers to traditional and new public service values.

Keywords: Modernisation of an Essential Public Service, Air Navigation Services, ANS, Financial Management, Accountability Regimes, ANS Providers, Modernisation of ANS, Historical view of ANS

JEL Classification: M4, M40, M41, M49

Suggested Citation

Jones, Alan and Guthrie, James, Protecting 'Public Interest' in Modernised Skies (September 3, 2008). The 5TH International Conference on Accounting, Auditing & Management in Public Sector Reforms, Amsterdam, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1358703

Alan Jones

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

James Guthrie (Contact Author)

Macquarie University - Department of Accounting and Finance ( email )

Sydney - NSW, 2109
Australia

University Of Bologna - Department of Management ( email )

P.Le Vittoria 15
Forli', 47121
Italy
+39-0543-374-621 (Phone)

Macquarie University, Macquarie Business School ( email )

New South Wales 2109
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
150
Abstract Views
1,278
Rank
352,794
PlumX Metrics