An Extensive Comparison of Operating-Lease Capitalisation Approaches and Their Unavoidable Assumptions: Are Further Disclosures Desirable?

40 Pages Posted: 30 May 2009 Last revised: 1 Oct 2009

See all articles by Mijntje Lückerath-Rovers

Mijntje Lückerath-Rovers

Tilburg University / TIAS

Auke de Bos

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law

Date Written: May 29, 2009

Abstract

Previous research of Imhoff, Lipe and Wright (1991), Beattie, Edwards and Goodacre (1998) and others has shown that the capitalisation of operating leases on the balance sheet has a major impact on the accounting ratios. This empirical study expands previous research on two issues. First, we refine the capitalisation methods that have been developed by previous researchers. Second, we expand the focus from the relevance criteria of operating-lease information to the completeness-criterion of decision-making usefulness as defined by the Conceptual Frameworks. The results show that in our dataset of Dutch non-financial listed companies during the period 2000-2004 only a small part did not report operating leases. Of the remaining companies, a major part (minimum 36%) did not comply with the accounting standards. The information is therefore not only incomplete, but also impractical in terms of facilitating a fair comparison with other companies. For the companies reporting operating leases, the operating leases appear to be meaningful and relevant. Also the information is essential when comparing companies. Further we conclude that the information required by the accounting standards is not complete while financial statement analysis is sensitive to assumptions with regard to discount rates, total and remaining lives. Also the different capitalisation approaches lead to significantly different capitalisation results. Based on our results we advise standard setters to require further disclosures in the notes.

Keywords: leasing, disclosure

JEL Classification: M41, M45

Suggested Citation

Lückerath-Rovers, Mijntje and de Bos, Auke, An Extensive Comparison of Operating-Lease Capitalisation Approaches and Their Unavoidable Assumptions: Are Further Disclosures Desirable? (May 29, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1411695 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1411695

Mijntje Lückerath-Rovers (Contact Author)

Tilburg University / TIAS ( email )

Warandelaan 2
Tilburg, North-Brabant 5071HS
Netherlands

Auke De Bos

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law ( email )

3000 DR Rotterdam
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
680
Abstract Views
3,736
Rank
70,746
PlumX Metrics